Unravelling Sydney's mummy mystery

Australian nuclear scientists are helping an international team of archaeologists and historians to unravel a mystery about a collection of Egyptian mummies prone to cross dressing and lying about their gender and their age.

Mummy
Nuclear techniques at ANSTO are used to date the Egyptian mummy. 

The University of Sydney’s Nicholson Museum is home of Australia’s largest collection of antiquities, including several mummies. It was established following a major donation by Sir Charles Nicholson (Chancellor 1854-1862), and includes artefacts from his tours of Egypt in 1856-7 and 1862. 

Former Assistant Curator of the museum, and now Honorary Associate at Macquarie University’s Department of Ancient History, Dr Karin Sowada, started investigations into origins of the mummies some years ago – which are revealing surprising results: 

  • Research (and carbon dating) published in 2011 revealed the mummy NM R28.2 inside a coffin belonging to a man called Padiashaikhet (725 – 700 BC) actually dated to the Roman period around 800 years later (68-129 AD);  
  • Research (and carbon dating) published in 2010 on a mummified head in the museum’s collection (N2M R32) revealed that it dated to the Ptolemaic Period (204 – 49 BC); previously the date of this head was unknown; and  
  • Perhaps most surprisingly, 2005 research (based on CT scans and other data) revealed mummy NM R27.3 was actually a man inside the coffin of a woman.  

It is this latter gender-bending mummy, NM R27.3, that is now subject of further study by archaeologists and scientists at the Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (ANSTO), who are using nuclear techniques to date the mummy.

“In the 19th century it was common for Western tourists and scholars who journeyed to Egypt to bring home mummies, coffins, and other artefacts as souvenirs,” Dr Sowada said. 

“Those antiquities were usually acquired from local dealers, whose attempts to maximise profits sometimes extended to breaking up objects for separate sale and creating ensembles that did not historically belong together, such as putting an unrelated mummy into a coffin. 

“As the decades passed on, many of these antiquities transferred from private collections to museums – where we are now starting to discover they are not all what we first thought. 

“Through analysing coffin styles, embalming techniques and wrapping methods, and techniques like DNA sampling, CT scans and carbon dating, we are starting to understand the real origins of many artefacts. 

“The research we are doing in Sydney really has major implications for collections across the country and across the world - particularly those in smaller museums which have acquired mummies from private sources as opposed to archaeological excavations.” 

Research published in 2005 showed mummy NM R27.3 was actually a man not a woman, and nuclear science techniques are now helping piece together more of the puzzle. 

“We know the mummification technique was interesting - wrapping the body, coating it in a plaster shell, painting it red and green, then wrapping it again,” Dr Sowada said. 

“This mimicked royal mummification methods, but appears to have been undertaken with cheaper plaster. This plaster was painted red and green in imitation of the god Osiris. 

“These shells have been reported sporadically in the literature but are rarely seen by modern scientists. This could be an early example of this technique used by non-royal individuals. 

“We do not unwrap mummies anymore – the plaster shell was only revealed under the gaze of a CT scanner and confirmed when samples were extracted from the wrappings during analysis. 

“Together with the plaster samples and CT scans, the carbon dating will help us nail the date and build a story about the origins of this mummy. 

“It is the carbon dating that will provide the third piece of the puzzle.”

NM R27.3 is the subject of a number of mysteries that's leading archaeologists and scientists at the Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (ANSTO), to study it further using nuclear techniques.
 
The Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (ANSTO) is custodian of the $460 million OPAL research reactor - one of the most advanced in the world. Its campus at Lucas Heights is also home to Australia’s most significant radiocarbon dating facilities. 

Radiocarbon dating is a process where the amount of Carbon-14 (C-14) in organic material is used as a measuring stick for its age. C-14 is in the atmosphere and becomes part of an organism as it grows. Once the organism dies the C-14 begins to decay away at a constant rate, so the older the material is the less C-14 it will have. By measuring the amount of C-14 left in a sample, and knowing the rate of decay, we can determine its age. 

“ANSTO scientists radiocarbon date objects as diverse as bones, textiles, pollen and shells,” said Dr Geraldine Jacobsen, ANSTO’s Task Leader, Accelerator Mass Spectrometry. 

“The radiocarbon dating we are doing now will help us get a lot closer to understanding when this person lived. 

“It is a team effort. We took samples of the fabric and extracted the carbon from the cellulose that make up the linen fibres. 

“This carbon was then converted to graphite so it could be measured using ANSTO’s two million volt tandem accelerator, STAR. 

“This uses what is called Accelerator Mass Spectrometry (AMS) to measure the amount of C-14, and it is from this measurement that the age is calculated.” 

The project is funded by the Australian Institute of Nuclear Science and Engineering (AINSE), administered by Macquarie University and is part of an international effort including ANSTO, The University of Sydney, Professor Mark Spigelman and Dr Carney Matheson. 

It is expected that the research will be submitted to Radiocarbon and peer reviewed, and pending that, published next year. 

Published: 21/08/2012

Recent articles

See all »

Media enquiry form

If you have a media enquiry please call
Phil McCall: +61 438 619 987

Or

Send »

Please provide us with your name, phone number and
email so we can get back to you.

Error: Enquiry was not sent! Check all fields have been populated correctly.
Success: Enquiry was sent successfully.